Page 1 of 1
Q:what makes the Super Bowl super A:porn
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 3:29 pm
by gurthoira
Comcast has apparently annoyed a few folks in Tuscon, who say that the carrier aired pornography briefly during last night's Super Bowl broadcast. Instead of Larry Fitzgerald celebrating his fourth quarter touchdown, viewers in Arizona were treated briefly to video of pornographer Evan Stone's anatomy. Luckily for Comcast it was only in one market, unlike the Janet Jackson breast flap of a few years ago. It also only apparently viewable by standard definition customers. "I just figured it was another commercial until I looked up," Cora King of Marana tells the Arizona Daily Star. "Then he did his little dance with everything hanging out."
http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Comc ... owl-100602
Re: Q:what makes the Super Bowl super A:porn
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 4:12 pm
by Guduk
And you should have seen one of the commercials they decided to not show at the super bowl.. meow
http://www.peta.org/content/standalone/ ... fault.aspx
Re: Q:what makes the Super Bowl super A:porn
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 4:14 pm
by Thalevia
And because it wasn't female nudity there won't be that much of an uproar over it.
Note the words annoyed in the report verses outrage when Janet showed the world her nipple piercing that covered anything bad.
Re: Q:what makes the Super Bowl super A:porn
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 4:37 pm
by gurthoira
Thalevia wrote:
And because it wasn't female nudity there won't be that much of an uproar over it.
Note the words annoyed in the report verses outrage when Janet showed the world her nipple piercing that covered anything bad.
I would think there would be more... maybe that just me being a red blood male.